Editor’s Pick: Biblical Historical Context

The blog Biblical Historical Context is worth following. The author has tackled many of the difficult subjects in the Bible, some of which we just don’t quite have an answer to yet, if ever. Some of the biggest contributions the author has made have been over the origins of the Israelites and the conquest narrative found in Joshua. Biblical Historical Context is written by a Christian who is refreshingly honest about the text. Add this blog to your regular reading.

Please consider supporting us on Patreon.

Caesar and the Lamb

Christianity has had a long history of promoting peace over force and violence. The reason starts with Jesus himself, who instructed Peter to put away the sword. The book Caesar and the Lamb: Early Christian Attitudes on War and Military Service discusses the Early Christians’ arguments for not participating in war. Early Christians believed that they already had a King, and their citizenship was in that future Kingdom. They were merely sojourners, immigrants, and aliens in the land of the Roman Empire. Therefore, they did not fight for Caesar, since Jesus was their King. I highly recommend this book for anyone who is interested in Early Christianity.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

I No Longer Have a Right to Remain Silent (4)

My Story

I have lived in isolation from the Christadelphian community forever. My mother was Catholic before she converted. My father’s side was also Catholic (apparently forced to become Catholics in order to flee Europe), and my grandfather married a Christadelphian (my grandmother on my father’s side). Bible study was simply with close family members, mainly my mother, grandmother, and aunt. Therefore, I have always more or less blazed my on path when it came to studying the bible. I rarely read Christadelphian literature. In fact, I can probably count on one hand how many books by Christadelphians I’ve actually read. Yet my beliefs are generally identical to Amended Statement of Faith. I’m also ethnically Jewish, and I even attended some yeshiva (Hebrew school) to learn Torah and studied a lot of Rambam’s works. I have been and remain influenced by Hasidic Judaism, specifically Chabad.

I went to college and received a BBA in Accounting and a Master’s in Accounting. Then I went to law school. I became a lawyer and certified public accountant. I also attended classes with the Mises Institute to become an economist. I have an investment company and recently passed the exam to become an Authorized IBC practitioner to help advise clients on capital growth. Soon I will take my life insurance exam to begin selling insurance. Later I plan to add banker and stock broker to my resume. I love all the things that I do, but my true passion is bible study.

However, despite my love for the bible and the Christadelphian community in general, I’ve ran into some surprising encounters with “brothers” and “sisters.” The first encounter with Christadelphian shunning was due to the Amended and Unamended split. My family, being new converts were unaware such a split even existed, until what we thought were close friends decided to disfellowship our family, because some relatives were Unamended. Still to this day, they refuse to fellowship us. When pointed out that we accept the Amended Statement of Faith, these amended brethren stated it doesn’t matter what we believe, it matters what we are called! Imagine that! If that is the case, I’m taking a page out of the Corinth church: I’m of Jesus, that is what I’m called! Truth is we refuse to be labeled either Amended or Unamended due to the harmful affects of the split. This behavior has had a major and lasting impact on my family, but has taught me the true meaning of fellowship and brotherhood: patience and love. However, this isn’t the only time Christadelphians have acted in surprising ways.

One time, while at a bible study weekend, one brother asked what I did for a living, and I told him I was an attorney; he looked at me with great disappoint and immediately walked away. He didn’t speak to me the rest of the weekend. Another person asked about adoptions. They were horrified that one needed to file a “suit” for the adoption, since according to their interpretation, Christians aren’t allowed to file suits. I found their reaction horrifying. According to them, no one can be adopted into a loving and caring family. To them, it is better that they aren’t adopted and loved, otherwise one would be breaking a law found in the bible.

Many Christadelphians have reached out to me about how they or their children wish to become attorneys. I think being an attorney is a great career, if someone truly wants to pursue that profession. Unfortunately, a stigma of shame is attached to the profession. However, when observed objectively, other professions have the same moral dilemmas, which we will discuss in a later post. I’m optimistic that Christadelphians in general are aware that being a lawyer is a great profession. Brothers and sisters should not look upon other attorneys as if they won’t be in the Kingdom of God.

I do not mean to cast Christadelphians in a category of condemnation. This is by no means the norm of Christadelphia. Usually, in fact almost always, Christadelphians are kind, loving, and open. Encounters to the contrary are the exception that proves the rule in my experience. However, these few incidents I’ve mentioned do point out a problem that Christadelphia has with the fellowship split, and the belief that one cannot be an attorney and serve God. These are two issues that is universally recognized in the Christadelphian community. But I’ve noticed in many discussions, that isn’t necessarily the beliefs of the individual. In fact, nearly everyone I speak to believes the fellowship split is unChristlike and harmful, and are happy to hear that I’m an attorney. These two things give me a lot of optimism for our community. However, the ones that promote the idea that you cannot be an attorney tend to be the loudest, very active on social media, and some are very influential. Their voices need to be countered by what I hope are constructive points in these blogs.

I no Longer Have a Right to Remain Silent (3)

Caricatures of Lawyers

Every profession and organization have caricatures attached to them that are completely false for the whole. For example, mechanics are perceived to be thieves who take advantage of those who do not know much about vehicle repair and maintenance; used car salesmen sell faulty vehicles and will tell you any lie to make a dollar; Christadelphia is a cult that will allow sexual abuse because their theology is prevents them reporting such cases to the government officials or separating from abusive spouses. Obviously there are isolated events where these things are true. But on the whole, mechanics do not take advantage of people, used car salesmen provide a necessary and honest service, and Christadelphians do not protect sexual abusers, despite the need to write a book to spot abuse and stop ecclesias from protecting and fostering such behavior.

Despite Matthew 7’s commandment not to judge, Christians are routinely guilty of casting blanket judgments. The author is certainly guilty of judging others. However, caricatures are a kind of judgment, as it casts entire groups into condemnation without any evidence to support it. We should not judge, but if we do cast dispersions upon people, we need to at least do it on an individual, case-by-case level, instead of blanket caricatures.

One of the most common caricatures is that lawyers enjoy the suffering of others so they can profit off that suffering. Lawyers generally are expensive. However, this is a law of economics rather than a case of schadenfreude. Attorneys have enormous overhead. Attorneys require a staff, building, very expensive malpractice insurance, subscriptions to form builders and research books, taxes, continuing education, bar dues, payments on an enormous student loan, and large funds just to pay the court fees. After all these things are paid, the lawyer has to take home enough to pay himself or herself, and feed a family. In addition, the better the service, the more in demand the service becomes; thus, prices go up for better service. This is no more a case of paying for freedom than going to the grocery store and paying for survival. Yet, frustration is thrown at attorneys for their fees, but not a grocery store, beef ranchers, or farmer for paying them just to survive and avoid starvation. In fact, 34% of income is spend on just food for many Americans! Lawyers provide a service, and like any other product, price and quality vary, which is why it is important to find the right attorney for you by doing a little research.

However, many attorneys, including the author, have provided free services for those who did not have any available funds. Some of these cases are funded by charity and government; others due to the good nature of the attorney. But, as mentioned above, economics still plays a role. If not funded by government or charity, the attorney must spend more time away from family to work more so he or she can make up the lost revenue.

The author has never known an attorney that enjoyed the suffering of others. There is the exception some have for people such as child molesters or rapist who are now suffering due to their consequences.

As mentioned in the previous post, there are certainly bad actors in the legal profession, just like any other profession. That being said, attorneys are highly regulated by the state bar as well as economics. Many attorneys who are not well skilled are quickly driven out of business as clients soon avoid them. Bad actors are doubly hurt by both economics and revocation of their license. Admittedly, it isn’t perfect, as there are still bad attorneys. However, it clearly demonstrates that the profession is overwhelming good, honest people.

I no Longer Have a Right to remain silent (2)

Why is this Paper Necessary?

The genesis of this paper came from a discussion on a Facebook group, which debated whether it was wise to be a lawyer. Many, if not most, of the comments displayed ignorance and caricatures of the practice of law, and then they made judgments based on those caricatures, some examples presented below. I certainly don’t blame the people for their caricatures of the legal practice; I know I have caricatures of other professions. Many of the views about lawyers are based on entertainment, such as books, television, and jokes. Sometimes attorneys make the news for their corruptness. However, we must abstain from making judgments, especially if we don’t have all the facts and knowledge of the profession.


Many Christadelphians have long viewed certain professions with contempt, believing the jobs, by their nature, put believers in precarious positions. Certainly, one could argue being a rifleman in the US army will always put a believer in a moral dilemma. However, being an attorney is not the same as being in the military. Almost no lawyer goes into the legal profession in order to bend the laws so that he or she can do whatever they want. Almost no lawyer practices so that he or she can ensure murders, rapists, and child molesters are free to roam the streets.

The legal profession is very diverse, and everyone needs one at some point in time. Whether you emigrate to another country, adopt a child, buy a house, or establish an ecclesia, lawyers are necessary for all of these things. Some Christadelphians have pushed people away from pursuing their dreams of becoming a lawyer based on misunderstandings of the practice of law, and quite frankly, faulty logic. Due to the amount of misunderstanding of the practice of law, and the rash judgments based on ignorance, this paper is necessary to dispel the myths about the legal profession. The Michael Cohen’s of the legal profession are very rare, and practically unheard of, in the similar vein of the Christadelphian criminal; however, both corrupt attorneys and Christadelphian criminals do exist. Christadelphians needs to have a full understanding of legal profession before coming to conclusions that preclude members from joining a profession that has helped the voiceless, penniless, and even Christadelphia. When Christadelphia makes these judgments against their brethren, they risk isolating their brothers and sisters.

I No Longer Have a Right to Remain Silent: Christadelphian Myths Concerning Lawyers-Overview

In this series I will be discussing Christadelphian views of lawyers in the context of a biblical approach and the general Christadelphian belief that only certain careers have ethical dilemmas. In reality the legal profession is like any other occupation. There are a variety of specialties, and even criminal attorneys are not the terrible people Christadelphians imagine. It is my firm belief that for the most part this misunderstanding about attorneys is innocent; however, I have encountered those who are antagonistic to lawyers based on willful ignorance of the true nature of the legal profession, and even to certain passages of the Bible. This series is not meant for the latter. But those who have an innocent misunderstanding. The following is the outline of the series.

  1. Introduction and Background
    1. Why is this paper necessary?
    2. Christadelphian Caricatures of Lawyers
    3. My Story
  2. Bible Texts and Contexts
  3. What It’s Really Like Being a Lawyer
    1. My Law Practice
    2. Criminal Law Practice
    3. Biblical Lessons for the Practicing Lawyer
  4. Other Professions and their Relationship with Lawyers
    1. Police Officers
    2. Firefighters
    3. Doctors, Nurses, and Ambulances
    4. Insurance Agents and Companies
    5. Certified Public Accountants and Tax Preparers
    6. Economists
    7. Bankers
    8. Landowners and Homeowners
    9. Business Owners
    10. Farmers and Ranchers
    11. Christadelphian Ecclesias
      1. Non-profit Status and Activities
      2. Using Lawyers
      3. Child Predators
      4. Legalism in the Ecclesia
  5. Conclusion
1 2 3 4 5 6